18:59 Ontario Child Protection System May Be Unsafe Children Ontario Child Protection System Children May Not Be Safe
A joint investigation by Global News and APTN has identified alarming conditions in group homes in Ontario, a network of private and non-profit facilities designed to protect some of the province’s most vulnerable children.
There is a significant number of injuries, widespread use of physical restraints and missing children among private service providers, the investigation found.
Former residents and child welfare experts paint a stunning portrait of a system that lacks qualified staff and neglects and even abuses some children who have experienced trauma or have complex mental health needs.
These findings are derived from interviews with more than 65 group domestic workers, young people and child welfare experts and an exclusive analysis of a database with more than 10,000 reports of serious events obtained through requests for freedom of information.
Also called SOR, the reports are submitted to the province by service providers such as child support companies, group home operators and foster care agencies. For example, SORs document when a child dies, is injured, disappears, or is physically handicapped.
Between June 2020 and May 2021, the Global / APTN investigation found that there were more than 1,000 reports of serious injuries and more than 2,000 reports of physical limitations – despite the province’s promise in 2017 to “minimize” their use.
READ MORE: Indigenous leaders, foster children condemn child welfare system
More than 12,000 children – aged 17 or younger – have been legally in the care of the Child Welfare Society at any one time in 2019, according to the latest figures from the province.
What happens in these homes is not disclosed to the public, unlike long-term care inspections or day care centers, which are published online.
Reports from the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services also found cases of children sleeping on dirty mattresses, lack of access to basic dental or medical care or appropriate clothing.
Child services used when children face abuse or neglect at home or are too difficult for their parents are part of an ecosystem serving children in Ontario at a cost of $ 1.8 billion in 2020.
Of Ontario’s approximately 300 licensed group homes, nearly half are run by for-profit private companies.
Ontario Group and Reception Homes with the Most Serious Event Reports from May 2020 to June 2021 (Ata Mutahar / Global News)
For some operators, each child in care provides a stream of income and comes with a “price”, say child welfare experts.
“The money flows with [kids] but it doesn’t flow to them, “said Kiaras Garabaghi, dean of public services at Metropolitan University of Toronto and formerly Ryerson University. “We are talking about the private sector, we are talking about generating profits, we are talking about companies that do business through children as a commodity.”
He said the data highlighted how the current child protection system does not focus on the “dignity and care” of young people.
“She currently has a young man in a group home somewhere who is hungry and not allowed to receive food,” Garabaghi said.
“Everywhere in the countryside there are young people who are moving from one place to another today, and all their belongings are packed in garbage bags.
“This is fundamentally problematic.”
Form created with a sketch.
The average cost of a group bed in a home is $ 315 a day, according to an analysis by Global News of quarterly financial data provided by child support companies to the Ontario government. But for children with more complex needs who need a one-on-one worker, that number could rise to more than $ 1,200 a day, as in a case reported by Global News / APTN.
And while private operators make up only 25 percent of the province-wide beds, they file 55 percent of all SORs in foster and group homes, including 83 percent of all physical restraints, 66 percent of missing youth reports, 62 percent of treatment errors and 31% of serious injuries.
Inside Mary Homes
An undated image of Amy Owen, Delana Land and Jessica Fowler. (Delivered)
Delana Land was reading the paranormal thriller What Lies Beneath in her bedroom one night when a Mary Homes worker told her to turn off the lights.
After asking to continue reading, she says that a dispute arose between her and the staff, which ended with a worker’s leg on his back.
“She snatched the book from my hand and said I was resisting,” said Land, who was 15 at the time. “She finally stepped on my back and then I just fell.
Originally from Asubpeeschoseewagong First Nation, in northern Ontario, Land arrived at the Mary Homes residence in 2015, about 2,000 kilometers from home and her family.
Private company Mary Homes operates five group homes in the Ottawa region.
She said two workers physically detained her before she fell to the floor.
“I was probably on the floor for about 20 minutes,” she said. “They were very vicious.”
READ MORE: The case against the coroner after the death of an indigenous child must continue
For young people like Land, who have bounced from home to home in the child protection system, the experience can be terrifying.
“I tried to open my window and I couldn’t. “There were nails in her windows because they thought we were going to jump out,” Land said, now 21. She said shoes and jackets were locked to prevent children from escaping.
“It was pretty scary.”
Residents who lived in Mary Homes said the food was locked and they did not have access to mental health support. They also said the staff was poorly trained.
SOR data for 2020-2021 show that Mary Homes has the highest number of reports of serious injuries in the province.
Picture of a staircase at the Rideau Center in Ottawa, where Deland Land lived. (Kenneth Jackson / APTN)
Unlike a foster home, Mary Homes staff work shifts to monitor young people.
Land said the home was so bad he fled after the death of 13-year-old Amy Owen. She lived on the stairs of the Rideau Center in Ottawa. According to her, it was better than living in Mary Homes.
“At least I didn’t go down without explaining myself first. I managed to recover. “
Form created with a sketch.
Mary Homes has rejected repeated requests to comment on allegations made by former residents. The company also declined to comment on data showing a large number of restrictions in their five group homes.
Since last January, the Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services has imposed conditions on Mary Homes group housing licenses, including the presentation of an updated policy on the use of restraints that employees must learn and comply with. The ministry also instructed senior managers to contact employees within 24 hours of the incident. If the manager finds that an employee has not complied with provincial regulations, the manager will need to submit a report, which must be kept in place and made available to ministry officials upon request.
At the same time, the ministry targeted one of Delana Land’s former homes: workers were no longer allowed to lock children’s shoes.
Model of physical constraints
Data analyzed by Global News and APTN revealed a number of incidents involving physical restraints, which could include immobilizing a child by the shoulders and wrists with outstretched arms, sometimes face down.
While group homes account for only 20 percent of the beds in the child protection system, they account for 90 percent of reports of physical limitations in residential care.
According to provincial regulations, these measures should only be used when a child or young person poses an immediate risk of injury to themselves or others.
The three service providers that submitted the most SORs were Enterphase Child & Family Services, Mary Homes and Hatts Off Inc. – account for almost a quarter of all SORs and 58% of physical restraint reports.
“Restrictions are considered therapeutic interventions. “I think the restrictions are acts of violence,” Garabaghi said. “Young people will certainly tell you that they are experienced as acts of violence.”
“We have an official system, a publicly regulated system in which institutional violence is considered normal and good.
‘They’re suffocating me’
Jessica Fowler entered the Ontario Child Protection System when she was just four years old. (Global news)
Jessica Fowler, a native of the Kingston area, was only four years old when she entered the child protection system.
Separated from her sisters, she moves through the system 15 times, including cases in which she says she has been abused or “hungry”.
“There is nothing I can do about my situation,” she said.
“It’s really scary when you’re in it because you don’t know where you’re going.”
Form created with a sketch.
She said the most violent experience was when she was 16 and arrived at the Mary Homes residence on the outskirts of Ottawa. She has also lived at Mary Homes’ residence in Wilhaven for some time.
Fowler said she was repeatedly humiliated, …
Add Comment